For reasons I don't understand, the Daniel Radcliffe nude photos [
click here for an example] on my site still draw masses of visitors after all these weeks, from medical websites in particularly, peculiarly. So, I'll see what happens with Daniel Craig ....
Well, I'm watching. Nothing's happening.
ReplyDeleteI'd get into the bath with my loofah primed
ReplyDeleteMuch lovelier here than in Bond where he's had his belly waxed
ReplyDeleteThats really disappointing. I thought he had a beast.
ReplyDeleteYou've all missed it - the shadow in the bath cuts across it - it's twice as big as it initially seems. Don't you people have eyes as well as mouths?
ReplyDeleteverryy lil dickk
ReplyDeleteCant u make it bigger please (im gay and hes my idol
ReplyDeleteHOLY PUBIC HAIR BATMAN!
ReplyDeletelmao
He's massive and that's just on the flop!
ReplyDeletewhy is it so small oh well he is still sexy as hell
ReplyDeleteLove the Bush!
ReplyDeletethis was filmed in 97-98 well before the whole manscaping pandemic. He looks uncut here but in Some Voices he is clearly circumcised.
ReplyDeleteeither way hes packin heat. wish he do a new movie with full frontal!
i would sit on that if it was erect but it is quite small and disapointing!!
ReplyDeleteI just watched the film last night and was quite surprised about how big it is. This picture does not do the man justice. The camera pan in the film shows that it is long and thick, and he has big balls and a full bush. The camera angle hid his facial features slightly, however, which made me wonder if the director used a double in the film. Anyone know if this is really Daniel Craig?
ReplyDeleteIt really is him. He agreed to do the nude scene because he was drunk. Thank god for beer.
ReplyDeletei want that....
ReplyDeleteHe has a beautiful body, and he is obviously not self-conscious about appearing nude in front of a camera. Let him do some more nude scenes. He has a gift, he can share it with his audience.
ReplyDeleteIts very heiry he needs to shave
ReplyDelete