Saturday, June 27, 2009

Duncan Fallowell: 'MJ just wanted to be deeply fucked'

Duncan Fallowell writes in response to my Disneyfied cockless-cuntless Michael Jackson posting below this:

Dear Madame

I don't think his songs are asexual. Many of the later ones seem to be coded confessions. Didn't he do one In The Closet? His whole act, I think, came to embody an intense yearning to be cherished and deeply fucked. Was sexual passivity ever more vocal?

Duncan Fallowell

Dear Duncan

Still trying to get a copy of your 20th Century Characters for your Jacko piece. I recall how astute you were.

I don't think his songs were asexual, either. Like many singers he masked his true romantic interests in conventional garb. His later stuff may be coded confessions. But his persona was disneyfied-asexual - as a refuge from the feared consequences of being himself.

I'm not at all sure he wanted to be deeply fucked, at least not literally. I can recall reading Jordy Chandler's court deposition: he described how MJ would blow him and eat his cum. In the sense that he wished to ingest "masculinity", this is the nearest to being "deeply fucked" I guess. But he might have needed yet more pain killers after a bout of penetrative loving. I'm not sure he wanted that level of sexual or emotional engagement. A gobble with a boy-man was as much as he could deal with. It was playtime followed by the famed sleepover.

Of course he should have gone to prison: Genet's sweaty jailhouse fantasies might then have been brought to life in MJ. Who can say?

Love as ever, MA x

127 comments:

  1. The mechanics are another matter. I'm talking of his Freudian core. Given his repressions, furtive masturbation with an unthreatening creature might be the most he could manage.

    Duncan

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't about Freud, I'm thinking more of his Matthew Freud side, the image as mirror of interior. We may be agreeing. I can't tell.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When you two have quite finished, can we get back to the music?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Of course, darling. Here we go. Ummmmm

    Ben, the two of us need look no more
    We both found what we were looking for
    With a friend to call my own
    I'll never be alone
    And you, my friend, will see
    You've got a friend in me
    (you've got a friend in me)

    ReplyDelete
  5. To Anonymous who said get back to the music, there is no dichotomy here. Pop music as such has negligible intellectual characteristics; its strength lies in sex and sexuality. Michael Jackson was a gifted entertainer who built a career on ambivalence: black/white, gay/straight, male/female etc. This is worth discussing, surely?

    Duncan

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good/bad, smart/naff, young/old, pretty/grotesque, approachable/aloof, fit/ill - any more?

    ReplyDelete
  7. On In The Closet - have been looking at the lyrics. It's a duet between MJ and Princess Stephanie of Monaco. The title is plainly teasing of MJ's public profile - he was forever the tease, always larky - and the song appears to be a primitive ode to cock-cunting.

    Stephanie confesses to Michael:

    "I Cannot Contain Myself
    When In Your Presence
    I'm So Humble
    Touch Me
    Don't Hide Our Love
    Woman To Man

    Michael responds:

    She's Just A Lover
    Who's Doin' Me By

    That's before he chants interminably:

    (She Wants To Give It)
    (Aahh, She Wants To Give It)

    In a later verse he comes to the point of the song:

    Just Promise Me
    Whatever We Say
    Or Whatever We Do
    To Each Other
    For Now We'll Make A Vow
    To Just
    Keep It In The Closet

    It's not very clear what should be kept in the closet, but it has to do with (her) lust.

    'Cause If It's Aching
    You Have To Rub It

    Interestingly, it is Stephanie who confesses her lust, not Michael who simply repeats:

    There's Something
    About You Baby
    That Makes Me Want
    To Give It To You

    In other words MJ is removed from consummation: he is the target of lust. There's no commitment from him to do anything about it - just his wish to keep it in the closet.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Michael's white socks intrigued me. I always thought his white socks were his colour bechmark.

    ReplyDelete
  9. . . . single yet married, sterile yet fertile, child yet parent . . .

    ReplyDelete
  10. And the single glove - very symbolic

    ReplyDelete
  11. What I can't get my head around is those 50 projected concerts in London. FIFTY. What was that really all about?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Made $20m a year yet penniless, sought to spread love yet always in litigation, etc

    ReplyDelete
  13. Surely Jacko's horoscope can tell us what Freud cannot. I'm surprised you've not mentioned his chart yet.

    ReplyDelete
  14. '50 concerts' was never going to be realistic. There were much more realistic ways for MJ to make £50 million. I think it was yet another fantasy trip.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Definitely MaybeSaturday, June 27, 2009

    Rumour is the longer-term ticket sales were looking uncertain and Jacko couldn't face the horror of half-empty auditoriums.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I've not double checked but I thought 750k tickets sold, a virtual sell out

    ReplyDelete
  17. Definitely MaybeSaturday, June 27, 2009

    Let's hope so.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've not really looked at MJ's chart in any detail tho' I see he had Moon in Pisces - oh dear! A sensitive flower just like me. No matter what good fortune is experienced, a sense of grief or bad omen accompanies this placement. His Virgo Sun explains his self-critical nature and Venus in Leo certainly explains the fame and flamboyance: at a glance I'm not seeing anomalies. I may look closer when the mood takes me. Only a properly calculated chart could flesh out his sexuality problems, and it's a pity we don't have a clock time of birth.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What the hell are Parkin, Halperin, Spacey, Mastini, Fish and Haslam doing in the labels? Why not McGowan, since you're at it?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks for reminding me, he's added now.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Duralex, you must get over your incredibly bloody jealous streak....MJ predicted his demise to Lisa Marie many years ago, and he will be missed by the music world and all his fans..(he is with Elvis now, eating peanut butter and banana sandwiches..)....so, Duralex, how would you like to leave this world..??
    do you have a sense of humor Duralex..???
    s~
    my best friend wants to know if you are a prophylactic figment of your imagination....your name certainly sounds like it...

    ReplyDelete
  22. I see Spacey has half a million followers on Twitter Steph. Much more than you.

    ReplyDelete
  23. madame is on top form again and i am frollicking in her reflected glory. madame has successfully moved on from that farah damji non-story. bravo. you are saying the things about mj that nobody else dares to say and for that reason i think i am falling in love with you. for the record, mj is not dead. he is alive and working in a tesco express in south-east london. the reason he faked his own death is he wants to come out of the closet and now has! by the way, he had gay sex with the r&b child molester R Kelly.

    ReplyDelete
  24. PS Steph Mastini who are the Forgotten Ones you mention in this fund or whatever? I'd like to donate something.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I am glad to hear I am no longer on Facebook and shall not be returning. Of course anyone can be Madame Arcati, it's a free-for-all.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Madame Arcati appears alive on Facebook. Farah Damji seems even less significant than Steph Mastini. Madame attracts those desperate for infamy.

    ReplyDelete
  27. If that is the case please send me the link. Alas, Madame Arcati is worldwide brand.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Madame Arcati please type your own name into the Facebook search engine. You will find that you are alive and kicking cara.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Mrs Duralex, Not Mrs Duralex... Within a day I've been married and divorced. Crisse, what a wonderful life! :-)))

    ReplyDelete
  30. I have typed Madame Arcati into the search for friends box (as I am no longer a member) and no matches are found. I have tried variants on the name including no space and caps - nothing. So either you are hallucinating or some other site has been set up only accessible to members - if such a thing exists.

    Farah, Toby, Precious - any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  31. " Farah Damji seems even less significant than Steph Mastini. Madame attracts those desperate for infamy."

    Indeed. This blog is a luxury sewer.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Thank you whoever for sending me the Facebook url. This takes me to the FB sign in page. However I have asked FB to investigate: please note Facebook is quite inadequate.

    ReplyDelete
  33. A luxury sewer you appear to wallow in. And why not?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sewer de Luxe - the best mankind can hope for coz God was so third-rate at creation.

    ReplyDelete
  35. And yet you continue to wallow, loving it. I must be doing something right, witless or not.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Leonardo Di LorenzoMonday, June 29, 2009

    Witless no. She has wit.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Ah Leonardo, a man of intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I am talking to Madame Arcati on Facebook right now. Definitely she is alive.

    ReplyDelete
  39. ..these flame attacks Madame. By so many anons who claim to know a sewer when they see one-that there is only one conclusion-they must be turds !.

    ReplyDelete
  40. "She has wit."

    She? Ha, good one!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Turds indeed. One of the turd anons here recently was forced off Twitter and is currently being investigated by Wiki following a police complaint by me two years ago. The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Well, give Madame Arcati on FB my love. Say: "Hello, JR!" There's another one on MySpace, too. Loves Judy Garland.

    ReplyDelete
  43. "The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor"..oh come on which actor ? Then again I suppose most actors have turds with fixations.

    I'm still reeling from reading that the funny looking singer from that old group-The New Seekers had a fan with a fixation who left a 100 doormats at her door-implying she treated her female fan like a doormat. Such style !. And she sold the doormats at a flea market.Obessed fans can be odd.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > One of the turd anons here recently was forced off Twitter >

    Wow, fascinating! What happened? We want all the details, man.

    > and is currently being investigated by Wiki following a police complaint by me two years ago. >

    Are you kidding? I checked your Wikipedia entry. Your former protector Krimpet has been banned from the admin team after a long string of incidents. As for your police complaint (if any) it's probably dead and buried by now.

    > The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor.
    >

    Seems to me this is the pot calling the kettle black, actually...

    ReplyDelete
  45. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  46. And you know where you can stick your Masked Cucumber.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > Ah, the turd in question! >

    Or its soulmate.

    > Still having problems with the idea of a free press, are you? >

    When the likes of you start talking about free press, there's a lot to worry about, both for the press and the freedom.

    > Over-identifying with celebs who you think need your sterling efforts as furtive defender before you embark on a serial-killing spree because the voices told you so? >

    Doubling with laughter. My poor Clover, if you knew!

    > Fuck off back to your filthy Nazi hole >

    Easy: just keep my posts for yourself and don't let them through. Unless you're a masochist.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Good grief, Madame. Calm down dear! It's only an anon who could be anyone and who "dudes" everyone. Project love not hate. He doesn't seem so bad. Where are those painkillers?

    ReplyDelete
  49. Thank you for the advice, Cruella. What goes up may come down. Or not at all. Depends.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > And you know where you can stick your Masked Cucumber. >

    Too funny! Thank you hun, you're making my day.

    ReplyDelete
  51. 57 comments now. Let's see if we can beat Farah's 106.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    And what's wrong with Nazis?

    ReplyDelete
  53. "Where are those painkillers?"

    bloody MJ took them all of course !

    I'm loving Cruella de JanuaryWinter2's bitching and MA is giving as good as she gets but I feel deprived and demand readers be illuminated as to what is behind this spat. It's far to cruel to keep it a secret and we should be let in on the fun.

    but really I just want to do my part for 106 posts..will that be a record ?

    this citizen journalism is so much fun.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Oh Cruella's an old foe - fixated on an actor of some note. The precise nature of the fixation is unknown to me. I don't claim to be a psychiatrist. Unfortunately, Cruella - for reasons best known to him/her/it - has a problem with modernity's current obsession with celebrity, at least with this actor's celebrity. Ordinarily I might think that no bad thing - the problem that is - but his/hers/its focus is ('ow you say?) partial. Indeed nothing quite else excites the poor diddums as his/her/its Twitter account confirmed before its removal. I don't know what Cruella thinks of the coverage of Michael Jackson. I wonder whether he/she/it has a view on this topic. I wonder whether he/she/it can work up the same passion. Let's see.

    Oh, and Cruella - you know what happens if you go too far. So don't waste your digit power if you feel you're losing control of yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > Indeed nothing quite else excites the poor diddums as his/her/its Twitter account confirmed before its removal. >

    Unfortunately for you I have seen it a few minutes before its owner deleted it: the page was desperately empty (no visible updates)! I did a research in the public timeline, to no result. My conclusion is that you're lying, but then it's not like we didn't know you're a liar, is it?

    > Oh, and Cruella - you know what happens if you go too far. >

    ??? I love those vague, empty threats. Oh but maybe you mean censorship? Haha.

    > So don't waste your digit power if you feel you're losing control of yourself. >

    Well, you know... as long as I keep control over you, I think I'll enjoy wasting it.

    xoxoxo

    ReplyDelete
  56. Oh it's you. I should have guessed. (I never lie - you're the liar. You closed down your Twitter account when I sent the message)

    ReplyDelete
  57. PS did you look at the people "you" were following? Honestly, what do you take me for?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Ah. you just lost control of yourself there Cruella. I have indeed gone through the Wiki history item and it's full of your name - all that energy! And to what end? Utterly pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > PS did you look at the people "you" were following? Honestly, what do you take me for? >

    And which people was "I" following, please? If you mean "a certain actor", LOL! Almost everyone on Twitter follows him, Stephen Fry and Ashton Kutcher.

    > I have indeed gone through the Wiki history item and it's full of your name >

    "My" name? "I" haven't visited Wiki for ages.

    ReplyDelete
  60. There were just 5 people you were following - Madame Arcati and the actor among them, as you well know. What a coincidence!

    And how coincidental you pop up after you were shooed off Twitter and identified yourself in these comments.

    The history on Wiki tells the story. It's all there with "your" name on it. All those pathetic entries.

    Oh, and about the censorship. You're appearing on my blog because I have ordained that you may do so. I am tolerating your presence. Do you have a blog or some website my readers can visit you on? - I am sure they would love to know what censorship limits you impose as you furtively try to censor others.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > There were just 5 people you were following - Madame Arcati and the actor among them, as you well know. What a coincidence! >

    How strange! I saw the actor and a couple other people I didn't know, but MA? Nope. Would have struck me.

    > You're appearing on my blog because I have ordained that you may do so. I am tolerating your presence. >

    Again, thanks for the laugh. I'm not all that anxious to appear on your blog. Being read by you and you alone is quite enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Dear readers, I can assure you that MA was on this freak's Twiiter following list.

    If you don't care to be on this site why have you spent the afternoon trying to have the last word? You're obsessed. OCD darling?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Definitely MaybeTuesday, June 30, 2009

    I can't leave the comments at 69 - far too suggestive for innocent little Michael J

    ReplyDelete
  64. Is it the heat?

    ReplyDelete
  65. I want to know more about Jackson's Freudian core

    ReplyDelete
  66. Thanks people, keep it going. It's funny. Some days I think: Why do I bother with the blog? It's not like it makes any fucking money. Then a tosspot like JW2 comes along and refreshes me, reinvigorates my sense of purpose, which is perhaps not what was intended. There are many people around trying to censor, some for very personal reasons (which could explain this tosspot) others for reasons best left for medical specialists to work out. But such people are dangerous.

    So, yes, hot today. 90 degrees at Wimbledon. Who was that tart making all the noise?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Freud was just a priest. Made up all that stuff. I'm surprised Duncan believes in such mumbo jumbo.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Freud is a con. He just created employment ops for psychiatrists and other problem creators. The subconscious is a myth. There isn't one. It's like the god thing - we have to make things up.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Definitely MaybeTuesday, June 30, 2009

    Just because things are made up doesn't mean they don't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  70. No, dear, the crystal ball is the con

    ReplyDelete
  71. The "prove it" is to the crystal ball thing.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Hot Aberdeen UncutTuesday, June 30, 2009

    Leave Freud alone an pick on someone yer own size.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Oh, MA darling! what fun! I didn't see all this happening. I want to contribute to the record too!

    I can attest that "it" was following you and the actor (what a bore - ZzzzZ!). Y'know I saw it.

    You can tell the turd that wallows, swallows! maybe that is why it is so bovvered over you commenting on the actor (yawn!) . The turd may be deluded into thinking it's the actor's sweetheart... and should come (or cum?) to the rescue.

    Let's do more! but I refuse to go to the turd's web page I can tell it must smell like sewage ...
    ;-*
    ox

    ReplyDelete
  74. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    > Dear readers, I can assure you that MA was on this freak's Twitter following list. >

    All right, let’s suppose so. One thing I’d like to understand then is why you didn’t decide to follow him/her and send him/her a discreet DM. I mean, what was your interest in shouting the news from your Twitter rooftop as you did? Wasn’t it more appropriate to intimidate JW2 without uncovering yourself? Just wondering.

    PS. Of course, as you should already know if your brains weren’t weakened by the heat, I am not the real JW2, neither am I the only Cruella de JW2 on this blog. There’s at least two of us: I stole the idea from another poster – seemed great fun to me. Besides, how can you be 100% sure if the JW2 you presumably kicked out of Twitter is the same who “outed” you on Wiki? Might just have been some troll who wanted to piss you off. This is the internet, bud!

    ReplyDelete
  75. Shoot first, ask questions later, that's Madame's way. To be honest I couldn't give a fuck who you are. The original JW2 would never use a word like dude or hun, I have the text of some of his deranged crap from 2007 - plainly a seasoned but angry writer. Probably a journalist. It's all stored away. And don't think I don't know about the actor in all this.

    As to Twitter, I did send a message to the twat and off he scarpered. Why do you think I was drawn to his account in the first place? I noticed he was following Madame Arcati. Cheeky, I thought. I decided to give him a little surprise. And it worked.

    As to my "exposure", I think that's a matter of universal indifference. It's a bit like some twat screaming at Dame Edna on stage, "Oooh, we know you're Barry Humphries!" Yeah, OK. Now fuck off out of it, fool. If I cared that much about it, do you imagine we'd be having this conversation? What Madame won't do for her public!

    Dude.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    "And don't think I don't know about the actor in all this."

    Oh give me a break, you're flattering yourself.

    "As to Twitter, I did send a message to the twat and off he scarpered."

    Well naturally: mission accomplished, programmed disintegration. Why do you think he introduced himself as JW2 in the first place? You're not so naive as to believe you impressed him, are you? Dude!

    ReplyDelete
  77. Ooh flash of temper there, watch it now. Who knows what to believe? Who cares? That's the internet for you. Hun.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    > As to my "exposure", I think that's a matter of universal indifference. >

    Really? Not yours apparently, judging from your Twitter rants against JW2 an MC, and all your legal threats against them, blah blah blah. Don't try to fool auntie Cruella.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Hey! where did everyone go? On to bed already? *sigh* Ok, but lets do some more in the morning. Let's flush out the turd!
    Goodnight MA darling,
    ox

    ReplyDelete
  80. it's unbearable..not knowing who the 'actor' is. Can't we even have a clue?

    (is that 89?)

    ReplyDelete
  81. incredulous...I seem to have missed a wild ride while travelling the last few days...and Atlanta was sooooo hot Madame..it's back North for me now..
    s~ x
    p.s. look back in past blogs MA....the recurring phrase regarding a certain pot and kettle..hmmmmmm
    you got HER there...

    ReplyDelete
  82. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Dear Aunty, My "rants" were aimed at actor fanboy dorks trying to censor me (as you are trying again now), my "exposure" literally the subject of universal indifference.

    Dear Steph, Good point about the pot and kettle.

    Dear Jacko's Ghost, How are the JW2s this fair morn?

    Dear ox, I am happy for the turds to float about unflushed. It keeps them occupied.

    ReplyDelete
  84. The father wants to display the body - and charge to view? Since he was cut out of the will, it could be clawback time.

    ReplyDelete
  85. The lying in state in a glass coffin is awful, so morbid. I wonder if JW2 have a view on this - of course it's hard for these witless dorks to creep out of the comfort zone of their god-actor, but perhaps they'll make an effort today. Just for show.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Glass coffin, mile-long queues, and Off the Wall playing on loop - sounds like a party

    ReplyDelete
  87. Kinder de SummerWednesday, July 01, 2009

    Idiots have their role. Cruella de Winter is so coooooling in this hot weather

    ReplyDelete
  88. A.N.Wilson is planning a book - The Michael Jackson I knew.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Not Bevis HillierWednesday, July 01, 2009

    Well, every time someone famous dies he cooks up some ridiculous tome claiming to be the great insider.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Not Bevis HillierWednesday, July 01, 2009

    He's already sketched out 'The Real Joan: a Literary Journey', for when Joan Collins pops her clogs. To be followed by 'Between the Chapters: My Friendship with God'. And 'The Byron Nobody Knew (except Me!)'.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Really? Is this public knowledge? Wilson wrote God's memoir didn't he? I hope he doesn't propose to leave Lucifer out. A history of the devil is what the Christmas market needs.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Not Bevis HillierWednesday, July 01, 2009

    No - that's Duncan Fallowell's book. Misunderstood: the private life of Satan.

    ReplyDelete
  93. I'll buy that!

    Oh look, we've broken the Madame Arcati record for comments.

    My especial thanks to JanuaryWinter2 for making this possible. I don't quite know how to repay you. Shall I promise not to do something -just for you? I know how you like your own private show. You said so yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    > I wonder if JW2 have a view on this - of course it's hard for these witless dorks to creep out of the comfort zone of their god-actor, but perhaps they'll make an effort today. Just for show. >

    I defy you to find any evidence that I am a diehard fan of said actor. In fact I couldn't care less about him, so you really should stop projecting your personal obsessions on me.
    Your personality just happens to interest me - you should be flattered - and I'm here for the fun.
    As to MJ, sorry, I'm not a diehard fan of his either. I just noticed he really looked like a zombie in the last months of his life. His death didn't surprise me in the slightest. I didn't shed a tear on him. Still don't. Is that enough?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Oh. Is that it? You must be the more normal member of the pack. Where's the loon who wrote all those pieces to various journalists and manifested signs of mental deterioration? Not that I'm without sympathy. But straitjackets have their uses, you know. The papers are full of stories about mental patients slashing poor old ladies to death in the street. Like Will Self, I'm rather fond of old ladies.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    > My especial thanks to JanuaryWinter2 for making this possible. >

    Don't thank me. I'm delighted to be the entertainment "du jour" for you and your little court of yapping lapdogs.

    > I don't quite know how to repay you. >

    Just keep on making a fool of yourself all over the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    > Where's the loon who wrote all those pieces to various journalists and manifested signs of mental deterioration? >

    Well, not here, obviously. I already told you I'm NOT JW2 and I have no idea what you're talking about. Fill me in, will you?

    ReplyDelete
  98. Am I making a fool of myself over the internet? An open question there for all to consider and respond to. Let's see what democracy sounds like.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    Democracy! Oh dude, such a big word for such a small question!

    ReplyDelete
  100. No, dude! Nothing's too small to interest the censor Nazis.

    ReplyDelete
  101. someone has to be the internet's fool so why not you?. It's an achievement after all and that's all that matters in these weirdo days.

    But the 'actor'..not even one tiny clue ?

    And where can one buy a ticket to view the corpse ?..it sounds like business as usual at Neverland.

    and did MA actually censor herself ?

    ReplyDelete
  102. Well, well, well... Seems to me that the Godwin Point has been reached and largely passed. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  103. By the way, did anyone ever intend to censor you, chéri? I must have missed a step somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Ooh, I've been missing more of the fun... that happens when you're on vacation and choose to oversleep (aah democracy!). Well, so we know Turddude, or at least one of the JW2 is a Baltimore "hon", secretly infatuated (probably all of them) with the actor and likes black pots and kettles. Now what?

    As to your poll MA darling: does it really matter that much to make a fool of ourselves a little now and then?

    Following Turddude, JW2, Auntie JW2 and their anon pet's conversation trail what I see is they all have very big issues with image, embarrassment, being exposed or exposing others. Point... shame... shame... point...

    You know I've argued with you before that public figures like the actor (snore) have every right to guard their intimate life; but isn't it curious how characters like these stooges whom take it upon themselves to "come to the rescue" just expose their own fears and respond trying to pass them on to others?

    This is the kind of situation where I enjoy pushing buttons and jeering. Grow up!

    ReplyDelete
  105. "But the 'actor'..not even one tiny clue ?"

    If you really knew your 'Madame' you wouldn't ask! :->

    ReplyDelete
  106. Certainly JanuaryWinter2 attempted to close down this site back in 2007 - a form of censorship that also had a quasi-criminal aspect to it which is why I informed the police. A journalist or editor was involved: I am a good judge of writing and the author of the demented screeds was a writer of sorts. I am not persuaded that the people presenting themselves as JW2 now are not the original(s).

    There are certain similarities in the mood shifts and eruptions of temnper that are familiar to me. Also the current JW2 lot have changed their tune on a number of themes such as the Twitter account: they're just squirming about and backtracking.

    I am asked about self-censorship - this is inevitable given the intolerable libel laws in the UK. But one of the reasons why I set up MA in the first place was to say things as I wanted them expressed and to write, as it were, on the hoof. Even if you write a book you end up having to explain yourself to some Oxbridge dimwit - or alternatively adopting a demented demotic in the style of Steven 'Seething' Wells - entertaining but not nuanced. Charlie Brooker has fallen into this trap, he's not read any more so much as marked out of 10.

    I, too, generally applaud any star who wishes to protect his or her private life. That doesn't mean however that his or her relatives have to buy in to the silence or shut up on their own recollections.

    AND, I do not like the omerta conspiracy that protects editors from public exposure of their venal sins. There is at least one London editor that has a problem with that notion. You know who you are, you cunt.

    Love and light. Bitches.

    ReplyDelete
  107. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Hear, hear to MA darling!
    ox

    ReplyDelete
  109. Xavier Ehret?! what else the hell is this?

    ReplyDelete
  110. MJ in a glass coffin? Sounds like a re-make of Snow White?

    ReplyDelete
  111. The late Michael JacksonWednesday, July 01, 2009

    Can someone lend me a condom? Heaven's great fun.

    ReplyDelete
  112. The late Michael JacksonWednesday, July 01, 2009

    The condom's for Him of course.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    > Also the current JW2 lot have changed their tune on a number of themes such as the Twitter account: they're just squirming about and backtracking. >

    Well, you know dude, unlike you I'm not afraid to admit I might be wrong sometimes. I didn't see you in JW2's following list, but maybe I didn't look close enough, or s/he had removed you when I visited, whatever. On second thought I chose to believe you, although you also might have researched him/her in the Twitter base, or might have been alerted about his/her presence by some zealous spy, who knows?

    Anyway who cares, basically? If s/he was there under that conspicuous identity, s/he probably had an Arcati related purpose, don't you think? Sounds logical to me, at least.

    ReplyDelete
  114. I noticed that JW2 was following MA on Twitter - I always go through my following list. I then sent JW2 a private message. Then JW2 disappeared and you turned up. Poirot once said, "I am not making hills out of the molemounds."

    ReplyDelete
  115. << The condom's for Him of course. >>

    Homeric laugh. God doesn't need a condom to fuck the whole world every second. That's why it's such a delightful mess. 8-)

    ReplyDelete
  116. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    I turned up because I'm one of your followers on Twitter (guess who,haha) and this old story popping up again made me feel like having a bit of fun. It's that simple, believe me, but you're at liberty to prefer your usual paranoia.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Then I shall get out my online dowser.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Backtracking dear Turddude? wondering about research, eh Bud? getting too close for comfort, Hun? You're using a lot of "s/he" now... feeling confused, man? Tell us how you really feel, dude!
    ox

    ReplyDelete
  119. Cruella de JanuaryWinter2Thursday, July 02, 2009

    I feel fine dude, thank you. Getting back to my favorite john now. Flush me out!

    ReplyDelete