tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post7694282145393181706..comments2023-10-21T11:46:32.529+01:00Comments on Madame Arcati: Duncan Fallowell: Postcard from ParisMadame Arcatihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04823823014493798116noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-15446769088537285832007-03-17T18:20:00.000+00:002007-03-17T18:20:00.000+00:00activitiyiyiyiyiyiy!!!!!!!!!!!activitiyiyiyiyiyiy!!!!!!!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-69902313441020540602007-03-17T17:22:00.000+00:002007-03-17T17:22:00.000+00:00my bathroom was vomited in by Sid Vicious. I'm put...my bathroom was vomited in by Sid Vicious. I'm putting it in the vendor pack.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-34227623701930054492007-03-17T10:40:00.000+00:002007-03-17T10:40:00.000+00:00Myrna knows her Madame. MA xMyrna knows her Madame. MA xMadame Arcatihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04823823014493798116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-69025143554459051172007-03-16T21:47:00.000+00:002007-03-16T21:47:00.000+00:00M is for Madame, A is for Arcati and x is for a ni...M is for Madame, A is for Arcati and x is for a nice little kiss. Am I wrong?<BR/>On the other hand, I'm sorry I'm not able to help Mr Fallowell solve the trompe l'œil mystery...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-18573759217616189802007-03-16T20:55:00.000+00:002007-03-16T20:55:00.000+00:00Why is Arcati signing herself Max?Why is Arcati signing herself Max?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-35250222019952239752007-03-16T20:03:00.000+00:002007-03-16T20:03:00.000+00:00nonoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-77738515589631589122007-03-16T20:02:00.000+00:002007-03-16T20:02:00.000+00:00Is this code for some disgusting activitiy?Is this code for some disgusting activitiy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-33371696428531092442007-03-16T17:06:00.000+00:002007-03-16T17:06:00.000+00:00Well,of course, yes, de Gaulle is the Queen Elizab...Well,of course, yes, de Gaulle is the Queen Elizabeth the First of France. As you know, Coward's painting style is mid-period Winston Churchill and this aspect of the trompe l'oeil was perhaps plausible. However it could have been the work of a pasticheur. Oh, the number of mid-period Churchill fakes! My mother even found one in the bring & buy sale at Finchampstead Village Hall. Many thanks for your interest. Duncan FallowellAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30643113.post-51402636282914191492007-03-16T16:47:00.000+00:002007-03-16T16:47:00.000+00:00>Wow, classy!>The question is : did Mr. Fallowell ...<< A few nights ago I went to dinner on the Ile Saint Louis >><BR/><BR/>Wow, classy!<BR/><BR/><< but I can find no reference in Philip Hoare's Coward biography to back up this particular trompe l'oeil. Can you throw further light on the matter or was I just being had? >><BR/><BR/>The question is : did Mr. Fallowell recognize Coward's personal painting style (if any)? That, in my humble opinion, must be more difficult than to identify Cocteau's "greek touch".<BR/><BR/>Whatever, in France, you can be sure you're being had when your host opens his bedroom door to show you the bed where Charles de Gaulle once slept. Those beds are certainly more numerous than the nights in De Gaulle's life ! <BR/><BR/>Duralex, delighted to be one of the illuminati. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com