Now, the abstract landscape is immediately below - the version India was rude about. Plainly she is no art critic. Then again, she doesn't claim to be Brian Sewell - can you imagine her immersing her arse in the sea as Brian once did on TV, nude? Frankly, Eric should return the abstract 'gift' to M.K. in my opinion. She claims he helped colour the work - he insisted on more red. M.K. writes on her site: 'Halfway through [painting], Joyce said it wasn’t red enough, so I had to add a lot more red and adjust all of the other colors. It’s got more red in it than I’d use, normally, but that’s what he wanted.'
Artist Rachel Mai says in her critique of the abstract: 'It seems to describe a rather materialistic personality of someone who has little communication between his conscious and his sub/ unconscious minds. Red, the base chakra, works for groundedness, prosperity and success. Hence for the Chinese, red is their "lucky colour". However, it is not usually considered an elevated colour for the aura and having a lot of it can indicate a base consciousness.' Rachel's Facebook page is here.
And this is M.K.'s sketch of Eric:
4 comments:
Oh yes and another thing. He's not as bright and shiny as he wants people to think he is.
Also, he is not as bright and shiny as he wants people to think he is. A lot of ego.
The landscape looks like a period gone mad, dahlings
I can't see what the landscape describes. Anger?
Post a Comment