Strange rumours swirl about the memory of 2001 guru Arthur C Clarke - I don't mean the fabricated nonsense that he was a paedo - and I hear newspapers are sniffing. I couldn't possibly repeat what I've heard, though I love a man who dresses well.
11 comments:
Duralex
said...
<< I couldn't possibly repeat what I've heard >>
Now that's a new one on me ! Why so shy ? Are Clarke's heirs that litigious ?
11 comments:
<< I couldn't possibly repeat what I've heard >>
Now that's a new one on me ! Why so shy ? Are Clarke's heirs that litigious ?
Put another way, I shouldn't have heard what I have heard so it's best for now if I adopt a discreet pose.
You're such a tease! xx
Such lovely stylish clobber. Makes you wonder where the money came from.
I thought Clarke was a paedo. Wasn't he listed?
Shall we say (with no fear of a lawsuit) that he preferred the company of young single men of a dusky hue. Like Rear Admiral Haslam.
That's public knowledge Matt and not a matter of interest.
WHO IS NOT? I am not! The kilt is Scottish highland dress, ye Lowlander!
Don't be coy - spill the dish.
As Clarke is unable to sue, I guess the problem is with the source of the funds for his wardrobe.
Or someone's wardrobe ...
Post a Comment