The Jimmy Savile myth unravels over a ton of claims of sexual abuse. Apparently we all knew about it whereas in fact most of us merely suspected he was a 'weirdo' because he behaved oddly, idolised his mother, wore tracksuits and red-tinted shades.
Rumours of Savile necrophilia in a hospital mortuary lost nothing in the repeating.
Now, the respected Oxford Astrologer starts her latest blog post with these words: 'A while ago I met someone who had been molested by the late kid's TV host Jimmy Savile back in the 1970s. I won't disgust you with the details; he was a little boy at the time and Savile a middle-aged man.'
The sooner we know the full details the better. Let's put aside the appalled face-pulling and other huff-puff shock-horrors and get down to the nitty-gritty. The man who spoke to the Oxford Astrologer should go straight to the police, if he has not already, and make his complaint. Better too late than not at all.
We need to know all the facts for a better understanding of Savile. He was not unique.
To read the Oxford Astrologer, click here.
9 comments:
Jimmy Saville visited the boys house that I was in and abused a boy from there. Somehow the reporters seem to think that boys who were abused are worth less, or are more guilty, than the girls. Perhaps they think sex with little girls is more natural than little boys. Whatever. We did not ask to be sexually molested and have to live with the memories.
How can we know this claims is true? Believing a child just because they are a child is as ridiculous as not believing an adult because they are an adult. There was nothing in Savile's known life that would have betrayed his sexual secrets. And the Oxford Astrologer's analysis is appalling. Just drivel framed by prejudices. Let's look for facts and evidence.
But hasn't Madame supported and defended Jonathan King for years?
No, Madame has not. She has however not pretended that he no longer exists. Whether you like to hear it or not, JK has contributed much to popular culture and continues to do so. He was punished for his sexual crimes. I am not about to allow the tabloids to script my reactions to people.
Someone on this Oxford Astrologer's site has written, 'Teachers at my school provided boys for Jimmy Savile, in the seventies. The school got some publicity. Few people seem to realise how deep the wounds are from child sex abuse - he is dead, but the truth still needs to be exposed.'
This story is such a blatant lie. I am amazed Arcati has fallen for this crap.
What I've noticed about this blog is its contempt for normal values.
In the Mirror today: "And in a new development, a teacher became the first MALE to claim he was molested by the children’s TV presenter, when he was a boy aged just 12."
I saw him with a 13 year old boy.
I did draw this post to the Mirror's attention. But whether the man interviewed is the one Oxford Astrologer's talking about, I have no idea. But thanks.
I see a photograph of one boy with Jimmy Savile's car in the Sunday paper - it makes me feel sick because it is a different child and a different place, but exactly the same abuse. Jimmy Savile abused boys from the boys school that I went to, in that same car.
How many abused boys are there?
Post a Comment