A number of you have emailed me about the astrology of the US/Syria situation. Will the US attack? Astrology is not about inevitabilities but trends and likelihoods. So here’s my analysis in plain English – with footnotes for fellow astrologers.
In the week of September 9, the US Congress will be asked to back President Obama’s proposed military action against Syria. I have chosen September 9th for this forecast because this marks the first day of the US government’s debate. I looked at three natal-transits charts: Syria’s, the US’s and Obama’s. All three charts suggest a likelihood of US military action against Syria.
Syria (1 January 1944, midnight, Damascus)
On the 9th, violent
and disruptive energies are present. Actions decided on between
September 9 and 11
will have the quality of violence with a transformative effect – whether this
happens days or weeks or months later. The action is aimed squarely at the
governing power.
At the same time, there is a major indication that power is exerted over the
governing authority in some shape or form – and this indicator remains valid to
October 29: it therefore may be the
case that Syria is subjected to external attack by a foreign state – this is
one of a number of possible scenarios. The Syrian government is nonetheless
confident, even smug – this could be because of perceived successes or
misjudgement – or a miscalculation.
US (4 July 1776, 5:10 pm, Philadelphia)
On and around the 9th,
the US chart reflects an instinct to act on high principle. There’s a sense of ‘social
duty’ and of public/media debate involving government. And there’s a high
likelihood of a decision to take military action. The focus of this action
is another country (or ‘abroad’). From September 16, the
risk of military action increases. However the legality or
constitutional justification appears confused. If the congressional
debate is not finalised before September 13 (Friday), there’s a chance the US
will decide against war. So, Obama is less likely
to win support the later in the week a congressional decision is made.
Obama (4 August 1961, 7:24 pm, Honolulu)
On or around the 9th,
Obama is under tremendous strain and possible criticism. Actions can be
thwarted or questioned – some sort of deception cannot be ruled out. But by the next week, the
16th onwards, Obama appears to be in much more energised form – the
planets support a war-like identity in this time. The weekend of September
14-15 also could be crucial for decisions related to military action.
For Obama the challenge is to
make real a principle or ‘dream’. At worst, there is likely
to be confusion between fact and fantasy and the challenge to make clear what
is murky or concealed. At best, law and clarity can be applied to an area of chaos
– the area identified as foreign by house position. However, the triggering
of a chaotic indicator in the chart is an unfortunate development, suggesting a
debilitating period ahead for Obama, especially if he’s acting on
misinformation or against government wishes.