Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Sting, Trudie Styler and those fucking truffles

Like an astronomer who thinks he’s detected a new distant galaxy far far away, Madame Arcati’s own eye is drawn increasingly to the supernova of a new Monster Couple and the burgeoning number of stories that suggest Trudie Styler and her husband Sting might benefit from a stint as street sweeps (preferably in a crime-ridden downtown district).

Styler is in the news today. She’s been taken to an employment tribunal by a former chef for unfair dismissal and sexual discrimination: the panel has already upheld Jane Martin’s former claim and will rule on the latter.

Martin’s account of working for the Stylers (or the Stings or the Sumners – I love multi-branding) is delightfully harrowing: any minute now Bette Davis will be disinterred for a comeback performance as the bitch chatelaine. Samples: “Staff are terrified of wife’s temper”; and: Styler “subjects staff to gratuitous abuse to make her feel royal”.

Perhaps my favourite: “Martin regularly ordered truffles by motorcycle dispatch from France and travelled 100 miles just to make soup for Miss Styler."

Did I imagine that she and Sting founded the Rainforest Foundation which, inter alia, “runs campaigns that seek to address the underlying causes of the destruction of tropical rainforests.”? I should think that sending out for truffles by motorcycle is most definitely a pre-environmentalism behaviour – just think of the size of those truffles’ carbon footprints alone.

Of course, Martin could be making all this up. But I doubt it. She was in Styler’s employ for 8 years and cooked for the likes of Madonna and Elton John – so she’s no obvious fly-by opportunist. And having observed Styler on Lorraine Kelly’s TV show the other day and scanned that surgically re-upholstered pretty face of hers – with one wrinkle cosmetically etched in for age-related credibility – I would say this is a face used to control, from the blocking false smiles and insolent legs-wide-apart pose to the repeated slow half-blinks to signal: “Don’t go there, Lorraine!”

And then there’s Sting himself, a taller variant on Bono as a bringer of peace (non-Pope division). Back In January it was reported that he had ordered the demolition of a distant fishing hut on the neighbouring Great Durnford Manor because it tarnished his view from a bedroom window on his 800-acre Lake House in Wiltshire. It then emerged he had built a barn that turned out to be considerably larger than that indicated in plans submitted to the local council.

Of course Sting is a tax exile and not at his UK estate very often – his summer residence is in Tuscany, the massive Pallagio estate, a few miles south of Florence, “where staff produce his own brands of olive oil and wine - products which also feature in their organic Christmas hampers.”

That at least helps to reduce his wife’s incontinent carbon heft.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

< Trudie Styler and her husband Sting might benefit from a stint as street sweeps (preferably in a crime-ridden downtown district).>

Perhaps it would do you good too !

Anonymous said...

I know someone who worked from Ms Styler years ago.. absolute nightmare she said...

Anonymous said...

This seems to be a personality conflict that went haywire. Martin had been getting along with Styler and then the birthday gifts descended to some paltry tulips. Martin and Styler would have been wise to part ways at that point. That Martin now claims Styler killed her unborn child is not only ludicrous, Martin naively scuttles her own career, broadcasting to all possible employers that she blames her problems on others and can be a difficult employee. In addition, she is peevish about those who have more wealth in life than she does (her allegations of Styler seeing herself as royalty smack of petty jealousies) and before anyone scans Martin's resume, we all know she is apt to ridicule many menu ideas and will assuredly insist upon using only local ingredients that she's in the mood to secure. Since Styler has given birth to 4 children, I doubt she had Martin marching around like a foot soldier for 14 hour stints. My guess is that Martin had ample time to rest within those 14 hours and again, future employers can muse ... this one won't make breakfast and hang around for a dinner party. Perhaps Martin will discover that she won but she also lost and if her career as a chef is dear to her, my vibes suggest she may have lost so much more than she won. Next time, realize a catfight has broken out and expand your career horizons before going for the jugular. Whoever advised her to go for the lawsuit was regretably not a friend despite the size of the judgement awarded her. Let's hope it wasn't her husband. That would be a pity.

Anonymous said...

What a complete load of rubbish from the above post.
Maybe you should do more research into Styler, then post your comment.
I agree with the street sweeping comment.
Bring them into the real world.

Anonymous said...

Styler will always have my sympathy because even if she was Joan of Arc, other ladies would take potshots at her simply because she is wealthy and married to a popular musician. She is an energetic woman, generous with her time and money and although she receives press coverage, her efforts are largely attributed to her husband. And as for the above poster, I can't blame you for getting on my case. There are two sides to every story. You are buying Martin's story because you believe she has been truthful with you but watch if your opinion doesn't change within the year. My foggy crystal ball suggests you may see a side to Jane that she shared many times with Styler but previously kept hidden from you. And I will agree with you. I think every single person on the planet might benefit from a stint as a street sweep because a little physical labor is highly enlightening and great exercise. I have done this. I see nothing to be ashamed of, I would do it again, and probably will because some times, the streets just need sweeping.

Madame Arcati said...

Thank you - but why would I be on your case? Who are you? Perhaps you'd like to email me in confidence. I don't quite understand what you're saying about Martin ....

Anonymous said...

The poster of May 11th felt my post of October 1st was a complete load of rubbish so I belatedly responded. My crystal ball is lively and capricious, rarely sharing juicy details with me so alas, I cannot pass them along. The gist was … May 11th is a friend of Martin’s—I can see it’s not part of the post but my crystal glossed right past this missing detail and delivered the missive. While I have absolutely no reason to cast aspersions on Martin and might find her the loveliest of ladies if I met her, my little demons, as I call them, find her behaviour suspect and in general, tend to spring up out of the woodwork to carp about silly things I know little about, apparently just because they feel like it. I’m intrigued—who wouldn’t be?