Alfie Allen's cock, click here
We all know Daniel Radcliffe can act but the only question on people's minds this morning is: How big is it? You will be pleased to learn that Madame Arcati was resplendent at the Gielgud for the first night of Peter Shaffer's Equus. All the queens (OK, critics) were in the front rows with programmes over their laps and their binocular lorgnettes primed for the nudity. I can report that Daniel's dick is of average proportion (about 3.5" in flaccid state) but inclined sometimes to 4" after he gives it a tug or two while his back is turned (sneaky!) to the audience. More impressive, if these things impress you, were his testicles which brought to my mind the query: Anyone for tennis? They rather swayed about to an alarming degree as he threw his person hither and thither the stage. So my theatrical advice to Dan is: prior to the disrobing scene snuggle your sac in ice for that tighter look. You don't want to frighten the horses, after all.
Daniel Radcliffe posterior shot, click here.
Read what it's like at 73 to have sex with a 23-year-old man
39 comments:
Daniel is also wonderfully furry in his mid-parts. I'm hoping he'll lead the backlash against body shaving and waxing by males, that awful plucked chicken look. I think he should be given a knighthood for services to sanity.
it's nearly eight inches erect
[More impressive, if these things impress you, were his testicles which brought to my mind the query: Anyone for tennis? They rather swayed about to an alarming degree as he threw his person hither and thither the stage.]
Oh, how comfortable this must be for the poor guy ! Okay, Arcati, I don't doubt you've watched very carefully his kit's performance, but how about his abilities as a stage actor, now ? Is Dan Radcliffe as convincing as Peter Firth was in the role of Strang ?
Peter Firth's cock was considerably larger it must be said - about 7" flaccid and girthsome. Such a monstrosity added a sinister, menacing touch that is lacking in Daniel's rendition. I have no personal interest in all this but we live in an age of science so everything must be weighed and measured.
If Strang is not suitably sinister then nothing quite works as hoped for - so perhaps Master Radcliffe should invest in one of those penis pumps, though in ordinary life he has nothing to worry about.
Now, Dinu, back to your fiddle.
3.5 to 4 inches is good for the lazy state, you know. I bet it's really big when it's proud.
There is not necessarily a correlation.
cut or uncut?
We should perhaps be grateful that Strang has not been reincarnated by Liam Neeson. On stage, nude, he would soon transmute Equus into Elephant.
He is cut or else wears his foreskin back, for which there is a growing vogue for hygiene reasons.
I still haven't the slightest information about Radcliffe's stage perfomance (I suspect you do it on purpose), but at least I know that what usually makes a man attractive to women – and to me...;-) – makes him sinister to you, my dear Arcati.
No further comment. I leave it to Duralex, he's much better than me at that kind of banter !
[Now, Dinu, back to your fiddle.]
With inexpressible joy! :-)
I'll never get to sleep tonight
The boy should squat into a bucket of warm water and apply the Jelq technique prior to his nude scene. This would most certainly enhance his diminutive flaccid state
He should just wank it for a few minutes before the scene. And Arcati, wearing the foreskin back? That would just tickle too much all day long.
Does Arcati wear hers off the shoulder too?
Is it just me who's finding this a little, er, uncomfortable. Yes, I know he's 17 but...that's Harry Potter you're talking about!
Perhaps they could get Hermoine to be a 'fluffer'!
It's Hermione. God, the people one has to mix with on these things.
It's Hermione. God, the people one has to mix with on these things.
Would somebody tell me what a Fluffer is? (I'm not a gay man, perhaps they're better informed)
Fluffer :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffing
And no, I'm not gay, but I wouldn't mind. Chacun prend son plaisir où il le trouve ! :-)
<< No further comment. I leave it to Duralex, he's much better than me at that kind of banter ! >>
Not yet tired of the "chimney" joke, master Dinu ? I think I won't resist the temptation, then. Did you notice that Arcati's already narrow pipe and her intellectual skills have been increasingly shrinking together in these later days ?
Ah, well, old age is a terrible wreck... :-)
I just saw a good clear photo of him nude. His penis and balls look quite proportional. The 3.5 to 4" estimate looks about right. He is definitely not circumsized, nor is his foreskin pulled back in the photo. And he's not very furry; he's quite well trimmed but not at all shaved. The overall effect is that he looks older than 17. If I were not old enough to be his mother I'd take the fluffer job in a heartbeat.
For anyone outside the UK who's claiming he's not cut (circumcised), based on fake photoshop photos, I suggest you go to the UK to see the stage show.
Arcati is totally right. Dan is either circumcised or wears his foreskin back. We were right near the front for his performance in Equus. We could see everything. His nude scene was about 5 mins long & his glans (head) was totally uncovered throughout. His dick looks fully circumcised rather than pulled back. The other people we were with completely agreed.
Also, we checked other websites of people who actually saw the stage play as opposed to the fake photo. They also agree he is circumcised. It looks neat so I think i'll get circumcised too. :)
< It looks neat so I think i'll get circumcised too. :) >
Will a circumcised penis be the new fashion accessory in the U.K.? It hurts, you know... :-)
By the way, did you pay 40 pounds just to see Radcliffe's willy? What did you think about the play?
I can certainly agree that Dan Radcliffe is in fact circumcised. I just saw the play three times in one week. I had seats in the 1st row, 2nd row and on the stage and there is no way he was able to retract his foreskin for that long during the scene. I was somewhat disappointed since I was rather hoping to see his foreskin.
Please don't let circumcision become a trend in the UK. That is the main reason I love British men.
Also, I must say that his performance was very good. By the third performance I was in tears at times, gaining a better understanding of the underlying messages.
Richard Griffiths was superb.
poor guy if he indeed is sliced.
Best and most sensitive part gone.
And I don't think any wizard skills can bring it back.
:(
Poor kid.
not bad considering what age he is!! he should be proud of himself 4 having the courage 2 come out of himself at that age!!
Cant wait for bed tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Harry and his cut 3.5-4 inch flacid cock
Some anonymous person said: "poor guy if he indeed is sliced. Best and most sensitive part gone."
Boy this is funny. There have been two studies on this issue recently. One organized and funded by an anti-circumcision group found what they wanted to fins while another from Canada found no difference in sensitivity on the head or the shaft of a bunch of circumcised and uncircumcised penises. See here: http://tinyurl.com/2loqdw
Those of us who were circumcised as adults can tell you that the natural glans is MUCH more sensitive than it is after circumcision, when it dries out and becomes calloused (keratinized). PLEASE don't follow the U.S. custom of routine infant circumcision. It is slowly dying out, and we Americans are looking forward to being more "natural" like the rest of the world (85% of whom are intact/uncut).
David in Baltimore is an anti-circ troll. His comments about dried out keratinized glans is absolute rubbish as anyone who is circumcised knows. On the other hand, sloppy, wet slimy smelly glans are much more a fact of life for uncuts.
Luckily, the rate of circ in the US is rising again(around 90% in native born Americans) and so the rate of penile diseases will remain low.
Daniel does a great job in this play, btw.
can someone or madame arcati post a pic/real pic of dan's penis and not some fake ones?i was not th near enough to get a good look.
here is a pic he isnt circ
http://easydoesituniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/daniel-radcliffe-penis.jpg
Saw the play this past weekend. Excellent performance. I was in the front row and am quite certain he's cut. If he IS uncut, then the skin was pulled back. The 'tennis balls' balls is quite the accurate description.
Who cares what size he is? 4 1/2" erect or 8", as long as someone teaches him how to wield it, he'll be a stud.
And as one who has been both cut AND uncut ... UNCUT is definitely preferred! As for the idiot that complains about the wetness or smell ... OMG! It is pure musk that you are talking about. It smells absolutely like pure sex. But ... some peole don't appreciate natural scent.
Oh well ...
Like b/o for example
That photo of him naked by the horse is fake (the owner of that penis was found) I'm sure he is probably circumcised, because like someone said before me, he is jewish.
I actually don't enjoy the smell of natural scents, it grosses me out for some odd reason, so yay for him being circumcised, not that there is a problem with it if he weren't, more of a selfish thing, lol.
Post a Comment