Saturday, June 27, 2009

Duncan Fallowell: 'MJ just wanted to be deeply fucked'

Duncan Fallowell writes in response to my Disneyfied cockless-cuntless Michael Jackson posting below this:

Dear Madame

I don't think his songs are asexual. Many of the later ones seem to be coded confessions. Didn't he do one In The Closet? His whole act, I think, came to embody an intense yearning to be cherished and deeply fucked. Was sexual passivity ever more vocal?

Duncan Fallowell

Dear Duncan

Still trying to get a copy of your 20th Century Characters for your Jacko piece. I recall how astute you were.

I don't think his songs were asexual, either. Like many singers he masked his true romantic interests in conventional garb. His later stuff may be coded confessions. But his persona was disneyfied-asexual - as a refuge from the feared consequences of being himself.

I'm not at all sure he wanted to be deeply fucked, at least not literally. I can recall reading Jordy Chandler's court deposition: he described how MJ would blow him and eat his cum. In the sense that he wished to ingest "masculinity", this is the nearest to being "deeply fucked" I guess. But he might have needed yet more pain killers after a bout of penetrative loving. I'm not sure he wanted that level of sexual or emotional engagement. A gobble with a boy-man was as much as he could deal with. It was playtime followed by the famed sleepover.

Of course he should have gone to prison: Genet's sweaty jailhouse fantasies might then have been brought to life in MJ. Who can say?

Love as ever, MA x

136 comments:

DRF said...

The mechanics are another matter. I'm talking of his Freudian core. Given his repressions, furtive masturbation with an unthreatening creature might be the most he could manage.

Duncan

Madame Arcati said...

I don't about Freud, I'm thinking more of his Matthew Freud side, the image as mirror of interior. We may be agreeing. I can't tell.

Anonymous said...

When you two have quite finished, can we get back to the music?

Madame Arcati said...

Of course, darling. Here we go. Ummmmm

Ben, the two of us need look no more
We both found what we were looking for
With a friend to call my own
I'll never be alone
And you, my friend, will see
You've got a friend in me
(you've got a friend in me)

DRF said...

To Anonymous who said get back to the music, there is no dichotomy here. Pop music as such has negligible intellectual characteristics; its strength lies in sex and sexuality. Michael Jackson was a gifted entertainer who built a career on ambivalence: black/white, gay/straight, male/female etc. This is worth discussing, surely?

Duncan

DRF said...

Good/bad, smart/naff, young/old, pretty/grotesque, approachable/aloof, fit/ill - any more?

Madame Arcati said...

On In The Closet - have been looking at the lyrics. It's a duet between MJ and Princess Stephanie of Monaco. The title is plainly teasing of MJ's public profile - he was forever the tease, always larky - and the song appears to be a primitive ode to cock-cunting.

Stephanie confesses to Michael:

"I Cannot Contain Myself
When In Your Presence
I'm So Humble
Touch Me
Don't Hide Our Love
Woman To Man

Michael responds:

She's Just A Lover
Who's Doin' Me By

That's before he chants interminably:

(She Wants To Give It)
(Aahh, She Wants To Give It)

In a later verse he comes to the point of the song:

Just Promise Me
Whatever We Say
Or Whatever We Do
To Each Other
For Now We'll Make A Vow
To Just
Keep It In The Closet

It's not very clear what should be kept in the closet, but it has to do with (her) lust.

'Cause If It's Aching
You Have To Rub It

Interestingly, it is Stephanie who confesses her lust, not Michael who simply repeats:

There's Something
About You Baby
That Makes Me Want
To Give It To You

In other words MJ is removed from consummation: he is the target of lust. There's no commitment from him to do anything about it - just his wish to keep it in the closet.

Anonymous said...

Michael's white socks intrigued me. I always thought his white socks were his colour bechmark.

DRF said...

. . . single yet married, sterile yet fertile, child yet parent . . .

Anonymous said...

And the single glove - very symbolic

Anonymous said...

What I can't get my head around is those 50 projected concerts in London. FIFTY. What was that really all about?

Madame Arcati said...

It was about making £50m net.

Anonymous said...

Made $20m a year yet penniless, sought to spread love yet always in litigation, etc

Anonymous said...

Surely Jacko's horoscope can tell us what Freud cannot. I'm surprised you've not mentioned his chart yet.

Anonymous said...

'50 concerts' was never going to be realistic. There were much more realistic ways for MJ to make £50 million. I think it was yet another fantasy trip.

Definitely Maybe said...

Rumour is the longer-term ticket sales were looking uncertain and Jacko couldn't face the horror of half-empty auditoriums.

Madame Arcati said...

I've not double checked but I thought 750k tickets sold, a virtual sell out

Definitely Maybe said...

Let's hope so.

Madame Arcati said...

I've not really looked at MJ's chart in any detail tho' I see he had Moon in Pisces - oh dear! A sensitive flower just like me. No matter what good fortune is experienced, a sense of grief or bad omen accompanies this placement. His Virgo Sun explains his self-critical nature and Venus in Leo certainly explains the fame and flamboyance: at a glance I'm not seeing anomalies. I may look closer when the mood takes me. Only a properly calculated chart could flesh out his sexuality problems, and it's a pity we don't have a clock time of birth.

Duralex said...

What the hell are Parkin, Halperin, Spacey, Mastini, Fish and Haslam doing in the labels? Why not McGowan, since you're at it?

Madame Arcati said...

Thanks for reminding me, he's added now.

forgotten ones fund/stephmastini said...

Duralex, you must get over your incredibly bloody jealous streak....MJ predicted his demise to Lisa Marie many years ago, and he will be missed by the music world and all his fans..(he is with Elvis now, eating peanut butter and banana sandwiches..)....so, Duralex, how would you like to leave this world..??
do you have a sense of humor Duralex..???
s~
my best friend wants to know if you are a prophylactic figment of your imagination....your name certainly sounds like it...

Mrs Duralex said...

I see Spacey has half a million followers on Twitter Steph. Much more than you.

Anonymous said...

madame is on top form again and i am frollicking in her reflected glory. madame has successfully moved on from that farah damji non-story. bravo. you are saying the things about mj that nobody else dares to say and for that reason i think i am falling in love with you. for the record, mj is not dead. he is alive and working in a tesco express in south-east london. the reason he faked his own death is he wants to come out of the closet and now has! by the way, he had gay sex with the r&b child molester R Kelly.

Anonymous said...

PS Steph Mastini who are the Forgotten Ones you mention in this fund or whatever? I'd like to donate something.

Anonymous said...

@Mrs Duralex : Stephie has quality followers on Twitter not half-wit asswipes like you. Like the size of a dick doesn't really matter. It's what you do with it darling. And you should put yours in your mouth or hold it firmly btwn two hands to stop you typing / saying anything else foolish.

Green Goddess said...

clearly not a non-story as I am still here and you are still anon.
That not-so-Precious Madame Arcati has been evicerated from FfaceBook, you coming back MA?

Not Mrs Duralex said...

> @Mrs Duralex : Stephie has quality followers on Twitter >

Quality followers like you, Farah Damji? Yes darling, you've been found out, now buzz off, bitch.

Madame Arcati said...

I am glad to hear I am no longer on Facebook and shall not be returning. Of course anyone can be Madame Arcati, it's a free-for-all.

Anonymous said...

Madame Arcati appears alive on Facebook. Farah Damji seems even less significant than Steph Mastini. Madame attracts those desperate for infamy.

Madame Arcati said...

If that is the case please send me the link. Alas, Madame Arcati is worldwide brand.

Durex said...

Madame Arcati please type your own name into the Facebook search engine. You will find that you are alive and kicking cara.

Anonymous said...

Found out? Really? Clearly you coudln't find your own cock / cunt in the dark.
Mrs Duralex, the only bitch, that clearly needs serious spading is you darling. Get a life. One in a grave, six feet under. Darling MA, so many haters? Nearly as bad as the Twitter whore and flies that come out when it's hot out. At least Stef and Farrah are INTERSTING.

Duralex said...

Mrs Duralex, Not Mrs Duralex... Within a day I've been married and divorced. Crisse, what a wonderful life! :-)))

Madame Arcati said...

I have typed Madame Arcati into the search for friends box (as I am no longer a member) and no matches are found. I have tried variants on the name including no space and caps - nothing. So either you are hallucinating or some other site has been set up only accessible to members - if such a thing exists.

Farah, Toby, Precious - any thoughts?

Anonymous said...

" Farah Damji seems even less significant than Steph Mastini. Madame attracts those desperate for infamy."

Indeed. This blog is a luxury sewer.

Madame Arcati said...

Thank you whoever for sending me the Facebook url. This takes me to the FB sign in page. However I have asked FB to investigate: please note Facebook is quite inadequate.

Madame Arcati said...

A luxury sewer you appear to wallow in. And why not?

Anonymous said...

"A luxury sewer you appear to wallow in."

Of course, once again I was expecting that poor, witless retort. Neither wallow, nor swallow, dude. Too shallow.

Anonymous said...

Sewer de Luxe - the best mankind can hope for coz God was so third-rate at creation.

Madame Arcati said...

And yet you continue to wallow, loving it. I must be doing something right, witless or not.

Leonardo Di Lorenzo said...

Witless no. She has wit.

Madame Arcati said...

Ah Leonardo, a man of intelligence.

Anonymous said...

I am talking to Madame Arcati on Facebook right now. Definitely she is alive.

Jacko's Ghost said...

..these flame attacks Madame. By so many anons who claim to know a sewer when they see one-that there is only one conclusion-they must be turds !.

Anonymous said...

"She has wit."

She? Ha, good one!

Madame Arcati said...

Turds indeed. One of the turd anons here recently was forced off Twitter and is currently being investigated by Wiki following a police complaint by me two years ago. The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor.

Madame Arcati said...

Well, give Madame Arcati on FB my love. Say: "Hello, JR!" There's another one on MySpace, too. Loves Judy Garland.

Jacko's Ghost said...

"The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor"..oh come on which actor ? Then again I suppose most actors have turds with fixations.

I'm still reeling from reading that the funny looking singer from that old group-The New Seekers had a fan with a fixation who left a 100 doormats at her door-implying she treated her female fan like a doormat. Such style !. And she sold the doormats at a flea market.Obessed fans can be odd.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> One of the turd anons here recently was forced off Twitter >

Wow, fascinating! What happened? We want all the details, man.

> and is currently being investigated by Wiki following a police complaint by me two years ago. >

Are you kidding? I checked your Wikipedia entry. Your former protector Krimpet has been banned from the admin team after a long string of incidents. As for your police complaint (if any) it's probably dead and buried by now.

> The turd has a hopeless fixation on a certain actor.
>

Seems to me this is the pot calling the kettle black, actually...

Madame Arcati said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Madame Arcati said...

Ah, the turd in question! Anyone would think me a magician - behold the Wiki maggot. Still having problems with the idea of a free press, are you? Over-identifying with celebs who you think need your sterling efforts as furtive defender before you embark on a serial-killing spree because the voices told you so? Fuck off back to your filthy Nazi hole, go on, give us your best salute, you scum.

Madame Arcati said...

And you know where you can stick your Masked Cucumber.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> Ah, the turd in question! >

Or its soulmate.

> Still having problems with the idea of a free press, are you? >

When the likes of you start talking about free press, there's a lot to worry about, both for the press and the freedom.

> Over-identifying with celebs who you think need your sterling efforts as furtive defender before you embark on a serial-killing spree because the voices told you so? >

Doubling with laughter. My poor Clover, if you knew!

> Fuck off back to your filthy Nazi hole >

Easy: just keep my posts for yourself and don't let them through. Unless you're a masochist.

Queen La Teef said...

Good grief, Madame. Calm down dear! It's only an anon who could be anyone and who "dudes" everyone. Project love not hate. He doesn't seem so bad. Where are those painkillers?

Madame Arcati said...

Thank you for the advice, Cruella. What goes up may come down. Or not at all. Depends.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> And you know where you can stick your Masked Cucumber. >

Too funny! Thank you hun, you're making my day.

Madame Arcati said...

57 comments now. Let's see if we can beat Farah's 106.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

And what's wrong with Nazis?

Jacko's Ghost said...

"Where are those painkillers?"

bloody MJ took them all of course !

I'm loving Cruella de JanuaryWinter2's bitching and MA is giving as good as she gets but I feel deprived and demand readers be illuminated as to what is behind this spat. It's far to cruel to keep it a secret and we should be let in on the fun.

but really I just want to do my part for 106 posts..will that be a record ?

this citizen journalism is so much fun.

Madame Arcati said...

Oh Cruella's an old foe - fixated on an actor of some note. The precise nature of the fixation is unknown to me. I don't claim to be a psychiatrist. Unfortunately, Cruella - for reasons best known to him/her/it - has a problem with modernity's current obsession with celebrity, at least with this actor's celebrity. Ordinarily I might think that no bad thing - the problem that is - but his/hers/its focus is ('ow you say?) partial. Indeed nothing quite else excites the poor diddums as his/her/its Twitter account confirmed before its removal. I don't know what Cruella thinks of the coverage of Michael Jackson. I wonder whether he/she/it has a view on this topic. I wonder whether he/she/it can work up the same passion. Let's see.

Oh, and Cruella - you know what happens if you go too far. So don't waste your digit power if you feel you're losing control of yourself.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> Indeed nothing quite else excites the poor diddums as his/her/its Twitter account confirmed before its removal. >

Unfortunately for you I have seen it a few minutes before its owner deleted it: the page was desperately empty (no visible updates)! I did a research in the public timeline, to no result. My conclusion is that you're lying, but then it's not like we didn't know you're a liar, is it?

> Oh, and Cruella - you know what happens if you go too far. >

??? I love those vague, empty threats. Oh but maybe you mean censorship? Haha.

> So don't waste your digit power if you feel you're losing control of yourself. >

Well, you know... as long as I keep control over you, I think I'll enjoy wasting it.

xoxoxo

Madame Arcati said...

Oh it's you. I should have guessed. (I never lie - you're the liar. You closed down your Twitter account when I sent the message)

Madame Arcati said...

PS did you look at the people "you" were following? Honestly, what do you take me for?

Madame Arcati said...

Ah. you just lost control of yourself there Cruella. I have indeed gone through the Wiki history item and it's full of your name - all that energy! And to what end? Utterly pathetic.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> PS did you look at the people "you" were following? Honestly, what do you take me for? >

And which people was "I" following, please? If you mean "a certain actor", LOL! Almost everyone on Twitter follows him, Stephen Fry and Ashton Kutcher.

> I have indeed gone through the Wiki history item and it's full of your name >

"My" name? "I" haven't visited Wiki for ages.

Madame Arcati said...

There were just 5 people you were following - Madame Arcati and the actor among them, as you well know. What a coincidence!

And how coincidental you pop up after you were shooed off Twitter and identified yourself in these comments.

The history on Wiki tells the story. It's all there with "your" name on it. All those pathetic entries.

Oh, and about the censorship. You're appearing on my blog because I have ordained that you may do so. I am tolerating your presence. Do you have a blog or some website my readers can visit you on? - I am sure they would love to know what censorship limits you impose as you furtively try to censor others.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> There were just 5 people you were following - Madame Arcati and the actor among them, as you well know. What a coincidence! >

How strange! I saw the actor and a couple other people I didn't know, but MA? Nope. Would have struck me.

> You're appearing on my blog because I have ordained that you may do so. I am tolerating your presence. >

Again, thanks for the laugh. I'm not all that anxious to appear on your blog. Being read by you and you alone is quite enough for me.

Madame Arcati said...

Dear readers, I can assure you that MA was on this freak's Twiiter following list.

If you don't care to be on this site why have you spent the afternoon trying to have the last word? You're obsessed. OCD darling?

Definitely Maybe said...

I can't leave the comments at 69 - far too suggestive for innocent little Michael J

Anonymous said...

Is it the heat?

Carl Jung said...

I want to know more about Jackson's Freudian core

Carol Jung said...

So do I

Madame Arcati said...

Thanks people, keep it going. It's funny. Some days I think: Why do I bother with the blog? It's not like it makes any fucking money. Then a tosspot like JW2 comes along and refreshes me, reinvigorates my sense of purpose, which is perhaps not what was intended. There are many people around trying to censor, some for very personal reasons (which could explain this tosspot) others for reasons best left for medical specialists to work out. But such people are dangerous.

So, yes, hot today. 90 degrees at Wimbledon. Who was that tart making all the noise?

Madame Arcati said...

Freud was just a priest. Made up all that stuff. I'm surprised Duncan believes in such mumbo jumbo.

Definitely Maybe said...

Don't blame your ignorance on Freud

Madame Arcati said...

Freud is a con. He just created employment ops for psychiatrists and other problem creators. The subconscious is a myth. There isn't one. It's like the god thing - we have to make things up.

Definitely Maybe said...

Just because things are made up doesn't mean they don't exist.

April Ashley said...

No, dear, the crystal ball is the con

Madame Arcati said...

Agreed.

Madame Arcati said...

Prove it.

Madame Arcati said...

The "prove it" is to the crystal ball thing.

Hot Aberdeen Uncut said...

Leave Freud alone an pick on someone yer own size.

Anonymous said...

Oh, MA darling! what fun! I didn't see all this happening. I want to contribute to the record too!

I can attest that "it" was following you and the actor (what a bore - ZzzzZ!). Y'know I saw it.

You can tell the turd that wallows, swallows! maybe that is why it is so bovvered over you commenting on the actor (yawn!) . The turd may be deluded into thinking it's the actor's sweetheart... and should come (or cum?) to the rescue.

Let's do more! but I refuse to go to the turd's web page I can tell it must smell like sewage ...
;-*
ox

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> Dear readers, I can assure you that MA was on this freak's Twitter following list. >

All right, let’s suppose so. One thing I’d like to understand then is why you didn’t decide to follow him/her and send him/her a discreet DM. I mean, what was your interest in shouting the news from your Twitter rooftop as you did? Wasn’t it more appropriate to intimidate JW2 without uncovering yourself? Just wondering.

PS. Of course, as you should already know if your brains weren’t weakened by the heat, I am not the real JW2, neither am I the only Cruella de JW2 on this blog. There’s at least two of us: I stole the idea from another poster – seemed great fun to me. Besides, how can you be 100% sure if the JW2 you presumably kicked out of Twitter is the same who “outed” you on Wiki? Might just have been some troll who wanted to piss you off. This is the internet, bud!

Madame Arcati said...

Shoot first, ask questions later, that's Madame's way. To be honest I couldn't give a fuck who you are. The original JW2 would never use a word like dude or hun, I have the text of some of his deranged crap from 2007 - plainly a seasoned but angry writer. Probably a journalist. It's all stored away. And don't think I don't know about the actor in all this.

As to Twitter, I did send a message to the twat and off he scarpered. Why do you think I was drawn to his account in the first place? I noticed he was following Madame Arcati. Cheeky, I thought. I decided to give him a little surprise. And it worked.

As to my "exposure", I think that's a matter of universal indifference. It's a bit like some twat screaming at Dame Edna on stage, "Oooh, we know you're Barry Humphries!" Yeah, OK. Now fuck off out of it, fool. If I cared that much about it, do you imagine we'd be having this conversation? What Madame won't do for her public!

Dude.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

"And don't think I don't know about the actor in all this."

Oh give me a break, you're flattering yourself.

"As to Twitter, I did send a message to the twat and off he scarpered."

Well naturally: mission accomplished, programmed disintegration. Why do you think he introduced himself as JW2 in the first place? You're not so naive as to believe you impressed him, are you? Dude!

Madame Arcati said...

Ooh flash of temper there, watch it now. Who knows what to believe? Who cares? That's the internet for you. Hun.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> As to my "exposure", I think that's a matter of universal indifference. >

Really? Not yours apparently, judging from your Twitter rants against JW2 an MC, and all your legal threats against them, blah blah blah. Don't try to fool auntie Cruella.

Anonymous said...

Hey! where did everyone go? On to bed already? *sigh* Ok, but lets do some more in the morning. Let's flush out the turd!
Goodnight MA darling,
ox

Jacko's Ghost said...

it's unbearable..not knowing who the 'actor' is. Can't we even have a clue?

(is that 89?)

forgotten ones fund/stephmastini said...

incredulous...I seem to have missed a wild ride while travelling the last few days...and Atlanta was sooooo hot Madame..it's back North for me now..
s~ x
p.s. look back in past blogs MA....the recurring phrase regarding a certain pot and kettle..hmmmmmm
you got HER there...

Madame Arcati said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Madame Arcati said...

Dear Aunty, My "rants" were aimed at actor fanboy dorks trying to censor me (as you are trying again now), my "exposure" literally the subject of universal indifference.

Dear Steph, Good point about the pot and kettle.

Dear Jacko's Ghost, How are the JW2s this fair morn?

Dear ox, I am happy for the turds to float about unflushed. It keeps them occupied.

Fan with a Difference said...

Who says that Jackson wasn't deeply fucked? There's a lot to come out yet.

Anonymous said...

The father wants to display the body - and charge to view? Since he was cut out of the will, it could be clawback time.

Madame Arcati said...

The lying in state in a glass coffin is awful, so morbid. I wonder if JW2 have a view on this - of course it's hard for these witless dorks to creep out of the comfort zone of their god-actor, but perhaps they'll make an effort today. Just for show.

Anonymous said...

Glass coffin, mile-long queues, and Off the Wall playing on loop - sounds like a party

Kinder de Summer said...

Idiots have their role. Cruella de Winter is so coooooling in this hot weather

Madame Arcati said...

Not untrue.

Anonymous said...

A.N.Wilson is planning a book - The Michael Jackson I knew.

Madame Arcati said...

Now, that's funny.

Not Bevis Hillier said...

Well, every time someone famous dies he cooks up some ridiculous tome claiming to be the great insider.

Not Bevis Hillier said...

He's already sketched out 'The Real Joan: a Literary Journey', for when Joan Collins pops her clogs. To be followed by 'Between the Chapters: My Friendship with God'. And 'The Byron Nobody Knew (except Me!)'.

Madame Arcati said...

Really? Is this public knowledge? Wilson wrote God's memoir didn't he? I hope he doesn't propose to leave Lucifer out. A history of the devil is what the Christmas market needs.

Not Bevis Hillier said...

No - that's Duncan Fallowell's book. Misunderstood: the private life of Satan.

Madame Arcati said...

I'll buy that!

Oh look, we've broken the Madame Arcati record for comments.

My especial thanks to JanuaryWinter2 for making this possible. I don't quite know how to repay you. Shall I promise not to do something -just for you? I know how you like your own private show. You said so yesterday.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> I wonder if JW2 have a view on this - of course it's hard for these witless dorks to creep out of the comfort zone of their god-actor, but perhaps they'll make an effort today. Just for show. >

I defy you to find any evidence that I am a diehard fan of said actor. In fact I couldn't care less about him, so you really should stop projecting your personal obsessions on me.
Your personality just happens to interest me - you should be flattered - and I'm here for the fun.
As to MJ, sorry, I'm not a diehard fan of his either. I just noticed he really looked like a zombie in the last months of his life. His death didn't surprise me in the slightest. I didn't shed a tear on him. Still don't. Is that enough?

Madame Arcati said...

Oh. Is that it? You must be the more normal member of the pack. Where's the loon who wrote all those pieces to various journalists and manifested signs of mental deterioration? Not that I'm without sympathy. But straitjackets have their uses, you know. The papers are full of stories about mental patients slashing poor old ladies to death in the street. Like Will Self, I'm rather fond of old ladies.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> My especial thanks to JanuaryWinter2 for making this possible. >

Don't thank me. I'm delighted to be the entertainment "du jour" for you and your little court of yapping lapdogs.

> I don't quite know how to repay you. >

Just keep on making a fool of yourself all over the internet.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> Where's the loon who wrote all those pieces to various journalists and manifested signs of mental deterioration? >

Well, not here, obviously. I already told you I'm NOT JW2 and I have no idea what you're talking about. Fill me in, will you?

Madame Arcati said...

Am I making a fool of myself over the internet? An open question there for all to consider and respond to. Let's see what democracy sounds like.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

Democracy! Oh dude, such a big word for such a small question!

Madame Arcati said...

No, dude! Nothing's too small to interest the censor Nazis.

Jacko's Ghost said...

someone has to be the internet's fool so why not you?. It's an achievement after all and that's all that matters in these weirdo days.

But the 'actor'..not even one tiny clue ?

And where can one buy a ticket to view the corpse ?..it sounds like business as usual at Neverland.

and did MA actually censor herself ?

Duralex said...

Well, well, well... Seems to me that the Godwin Point has been reached and largely passed. ;-)

Duralex said...

By the way, did anyone ever intend to censor you, chéri? I must have missed a step somewhere.

Anonymous said...

Ooh, I've been missing more of the fun... that happens when you're on vacation and choose to oversleep (aah democracy!). Well, so we know Turddude, or at least one of the JW2 is a Baltimore "hon", secretly infatuated (probably all of them) with the actor and likes black pots and kettles. Now what?

As to your poll MA darling: does it really matter that much to make a fool of ourselves a little now and then?

Following Turddude, JW2, Auntie JW2 and their anon pet's conversation trail what I see is they all have very big issues with image, embarrassment, being exposed or exposing others. Point... shame... shame... point...

You know I've argued with you before that public figures like the actor (snore) have every right to guard their intimate life; but isn't it curious how characters like these stooges whom take it upon themselves to "come to the rescue" just expose their own fears and respond trying to pass them on to others?

This is the kind of situation where I enjoy pushing buttons and jeering. Grow up!

Anonymous said...

"But the 'actor'..not even one tiny clue ?"

If you really knew your 'Madame' you wouldn't ask! :->

Madame Arcati said...

Certainly JanuaryWinter2 attempted to close down this site back in 2007 - a form of censorship that also had a quasi-criminal aspect to it which is why I informed the police. A journalist or editor was involved: I am a good judge of writing and the author of the demented screeds was a writer of sorts. I am not persuaded that the people presenting themselves as JW2 now are not the original(s).

There are certain similarities in the mood shifts and eruptions of temnper that are familiar to me. Also the current JW2 lot have changed their tune on a number of themes such as the Twitter account: they're just squirming about and backtracking.

I am asked about self-censorship - this is inevitable given the intolerable libel laws in the UK. But one of the reasons why I set up MA in the first place was to say things as I wanted them expressed and to write, as it were, on the hoof. Even if you write a book you end up having to explain yourself to some Oxbridge dimwit - or alternatively adopting a demented demotic in the style of Steven 'Seething' Wells - entertaining but not nuanced. Charlie Brooker has fallen into this trap, he's not read any more so much as marked out of 10.

I, too, generally applaud any star who wishes to protect his or her private life. That doesn't mean however that his or her relatives have to buy in to the silence or shut up on their own recollections.

AND, I do not like the omerta conspiracy that protects editors from public exposure of their venal sins. There is at least one London editor that has a problem with that notion. You know who you are, you cunt.

Love and light. Bitches.

Madame Arcati said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jacko's Ghost said...

crikey!

Anonymous said...

Hear, hear to MA darling!
ox

Madame Arcati said...

Who's this Xavier Ehret?

Duralex said...

Xavier Ehret?! what else the hell is this?

Anonymous said...

MJ in a glass coffin? Sounds like a re-make of Snow White?

The late Michael Jackson said...

Can someone lend me a condom? Heaven's great fun.

The late Michael Jackson said...

The condom's for Him of course.

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

> Also the current JW2 lot have changed their tune on a number of themes such as the Twitter account: they're just squirming about and backtracking. >

Well, you know dude, unlike you I'm not afraid to admit I might be wrong sometimes. I didn't see you in JW2's following list, but maybe I didn't look close enough, or s/he had removed you when I visited, whatever. On second thought I chose to believe you, although you also might have researched him/her in the Twitter base, or might have been alerted about his/her presence by some zealous spy, who knows?

Anyway who cares, basically? If s/he was there under that conspicuous identity, s/he probably had an Arcati related purpose, don't you think? Sounds logical to me, at least.

Madame Arcati said...

I noticed that JW2 was following MA on Twitter - I always go through my following list. I then sent JW2 a private message. Then JW2 disappeared and you turned up. Poirot once said, "I am not making hills out of the molemounds."

Duralex said...

<< The condom's for Him of course. >>

Homeric laugh. God doesn't need a condom to fuck the whole world every second. That's why it's such a delightful mess. 8-)

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

I turned up because I'm one of your followers on Twitter (guess who,haha) and this old story popping up again made me feel like having a bit of fun. It's that simple, believe me, but you're at liberty to prefer your usual paranoia.

Madame Arcati said...

Then I shall get out my online dowser.

Anonymous said...

Backtracking dear Turddude? wondering about research, eh Bud? getting too close for comfort, Hun? You're using a lot of "s/he" now... feeling confused, man? Tell us how you really feel, dude!
ox

Cruella de JanuaryWinter2 said...

I feel fine dude, thank you. Getting back to my favorite john now. Flush me out!

jennifer said...

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Betty

http://mortgagecalculato-r.com