Saturday, October 13, 2007

Madame Arcati: Shock sex poll result!

In a shock poll result, 100% of voters came to the wrong conclusion about Madame Arcati's sexual orientative classification.

Seventy percent thought she was a cock-cocker, 16% a cunt-cunter, 8% a cunt-cocker and 4% a cock-cunter.

Madame Arcati comments: "It is truly appalling that an entire international electorate can get it wrong. It doesn't say much for democracy. The clue to the right answer lies in the fact that no one can demonstrate who or what I am (or, we are) - but this did not stop people jumping to foolish conclusions based on school playground a priori assumptions or prejudices. No wonder Kevin Spacey refuses to discuss his preference for hunky twinks."

Nonetheless, Madame Arcati finished on a positive note: "Those who elected not to vote got it right."

7 comments:

Joseph Stalin said...

The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.

Duralex said...

Very funny indeed. As your poll attracted less than 100 voters, I suppose many people (I, for one) suspected that the right answer was not listed.

But too late, Madame chérie. Vox populi, vox dei : you're a cock-cocker now, and will be so forever whether you like it or not ! :-)

Lorenzo said...

> The clue to the right answer lies in the fact that no one can demonstrate who or what I am (or, we are)

Let's put it that way, then: one of Arcati's heads (if any) is a dick dicker's head. And a fanatical gay activist's head, at that. Only some kind of Perez Hilton can so ridiculously dedicate his life to "outing" allegedly gay personalities.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

>< one of Arcati's heads (if any) is a dick dicker's head. <<

But... Wait a minute! Arcati does have an openly gay dear friend, a seemingly nice guy who often emails her or posts casual comments on her blog, but oddly, NEVER about the Spacey/Fowler/Mastini saga, heavy and tiresome though it may be. Moreover, sharp-sighted readers must have noticed a perceptible stylistic difference between the Spacey-related articles and the rest of the Arcati production...
Yes, it all makes sense, suddenly! In the classic "whodunit" detective stories, the actual guilty one is always (apparently) above all suspicion.
What an embarrassing situation for him if the dog-eat-dog world of the British press should have wind of such a ludicrous behaviour! Oh God, that gives me an idea...

suszen said...

First of all it is good to read this article and it's a very funny indeed. If you attract the poll less than 100 voters then defenitly I will support the people.

===================
suszen

http://www.hookup-tonite.com